Grab bag: Negotiations of various kinds.

Grab bag: Hacking copyright

Virginia Glee Club history: Harrison Randolph

harrisonrandolphExploring some of Google’s new search options a week ago bore surprising fruit, as I discovered enough about the first named conductor of the Virginia Glee Club, Harrison Randolph, to write a Wikipedia article about him. There has long been little publicly available information about Randolph, aside from a mention in Philip Bruce’s 1921 five volume history of the University of Virginia and his presence in the archival 1893 Glee Club photo that also features the author of the “Good Old Song.” The liner notes to the Club’s 1972 recording A Shadow’s on the Sundial place him as the organist at the University Chapel, but otherwise he seemed doomed to fade into obscurity.

However, when I did a news timeline search for “virginia glee club”, I turned up some hits in the 1890s that I hadn’t seen before. In particular, one 1894 report in the Atlanta Constitution gave me quite a bit more information about Randolph and the boys of the Glee Club than I had seen previously. In this case, the description of Randolph as an “instructor of mathematics” made me go back and look deeper into his biography, and I turned up a fuller biography of him in a 1920-era volume that says that he left Virginia in 1895 to go to the University of Arkansas, and then in 1897 to the presidency of the College of Charleston, where he spent nearly the next 50 years.

It appears, despite his accomplishments, that the directorship of the Glee Club was not then without its perils; the Constitution gives a glowing description of his intellect, then drily notes, “To him has been allotted the awful task of directing the Glee Club.” Even allowing for the “amazing,” “awe-inspiring” sense of the word, one still feels the pressure of the world on Randolph’s young shoulders, particularly looking back at his 1893 photograph. Born the same year as the Glee Club itself, he looks at the age of 22 smaller and more exhausted than those around him in the publicity photo. Is it any wonder that only two short years later he fled to the relatively safer world of academia?

For those with patience, I’ve added the text of the original 1894 concert review article; it provides a rare glimpse at the mechanics of how the Glee, Banjo, and Mandolin clubs worked together and gives thumbnail biographies of each member.

Grab bag: Be for something, fail fast, look around

Grab bag: Apple secures, Verizon out of copper

Grab bag: Information wants to be in a river

Grab bag: Humility, utopia, and self control

The Forrester application survey: 62% hacked through apps

Last week I indulged in a little live tweeting of a webinar my firm, Veracode, did with Chanxi Wang of Forrester, following up on our recent announcement of an independent survey in which 62% of the respondents reported being breached through at least one application vulnerability in 2008.

I’ve reposted the substance of my tweets below, followed by my $0.02 on the survey:

  • (1) #Veracode & Forrester app risk mgmt survey: in 2008 62% of respondents were breached thru app vulns but don’t know their app risk.
  • (2) As Kaspersky breach shows, 3rd party code is a big blind spot for most orgs.
  • (3) open source, outsourced and off the shelf code used frequently but 59% don’t do anything to secure OSS.
  • (4) only 32% require security at all stages of sdlc.
  • (5) top training method in 37% of respondents is to learn on the job from experienced devs… who can’t be hired.
  • (6) False sense of security pervasive. 94% think they know security of app portfolio but 40% dont know COTS risk
  • (7) ease of use plus secure plus time saving is driving factor for third party assessments.
  • (8) if you outsource code, consider outsourcing security assessments too.

Bottom line: the survey results suggest that application vulnerabilities lead to real risk for a lot of companies, but most companies don’t have secure practices that cover their development or training adequately, to say nothing of the risk from third party code.

Grab bag: Getting, and not getting, the Web

Grab bag: Blinking into the light of 2009

More intense inner torment, please

  • There’s probably a version of these markings for Mahler’s #2, because many of them look appropriate, e.g. “Langsam – Slowly; Schleppend – Slowly; Dampfer auf – Slowly; Mit Dampfer – Slowly; Allmahlich in das Hauptzeitmass ubergehen – Do not look at the conductor; Im Anfang sehr gemaechlich – In intense inner torment; Alle Betonungen sehr zart – With more intense inner torment; Getheilt (geth.) – Out of tune.”

Grab bag: Charging the pirates edition